Return to Labor News | Return to Home page

Published October 5, 2108 in The Wall Street Journal

Teamsters Reject UPS Contract

Union says 54.3% of votes cast opposed pact, but leadership says protest vote isn’t enough to derail the deal

boeing calling back retires to fix 737 production snags

By Paul Ziobro

Teamsters members voted down a new contract with United Parcel Service Inc., UPS +0.70% sending both sides back to the negotiating table ahead of the holiday season.

Preliminary voting results showed that 54.3% of votes cast opposed the five-year deal that represents 243,000 drivers, package sorters and other workers, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters disclosed Friday evening. Another pact representing 11,000 UPS Freight workers was also rejected, with 62.1% of votes cast opposing that deal.

A number of other regional and local agreements were also rejected, dealing a blow to the Teamsters leadership and UPS that tried to sell its rank-and-file on the contracts.

Union leaders said they would reopen talks with the company. “We will be going back to the company to talk to them about some additional changes,” said Denis Taylor, co-chair of the Teamsters negotiating committee.

The Teamsters, however, issued a statement saying the union considered the contract ratified even though it had been defeated. Under the union’s rules, a contract needs to be rejected by two-thirds of ballots when less than 50% of members cast a vote. The final tally was 42,356 in favor and 50,248 opposed.

A UPS spokesman said that the company was disappointed with the results and will meet with the Teamsters to discuss next steps. A contract extension is in place for the previous deal that expired in July and the company expects business to operate as usual.

“The Teamsters’ negotiating committee and UPS developed fair agreements that reward UPS employees for their contributions to the company’s success, including improved wages, benefits and job creation,” company spokesman Steve Gaut said.

The vote adds a layer of uncertainty to UPS operations as it heads into the critical peak period, when the amount of packages flowing through its network spikes.

The tentative deal, reached between the company and union leaders in July, faced a persistent campaign from a Teamster faction that objected to a two-tier wage system for drivers and starting wages that will soon trail those offered at Inc.

“Our members spoke loud and clear,” said Sean O’Brien, a Teamster leader in Boston who opposed the deal. “This contract is clearly concessionary and the leadership should listen to the membership and go back and get what our members deserve.”

The contract is one of the largest collective bargaining agreements in North America and is seen as critical in mapping out the delivery giant’s cost structure at a time when it is delivering more packages than ever due to online shopping.
The creation of a two-tier system would have let the company use lower-paid workers to deliver packages on weekends, including possibly on Sundays, curbing delivery costs. The Teamsters leaders said it would also allow package sorters and other workers to graduate to a higher pay rate.

A group opposed to current union leadership, Teamsters for a Democratic Union, argued the weekend-driver position created division among the workforce since people would be doing the same job as a higher-paid package-truck driver at a lower rate.
The opposition seized on news this week that Amazon is raising its starting wages to $15 an hour, highlighting that the proposed UPS contract called for a starting hourly rate of $13 and wouldn’t reach $15 until 2021.

Before the vote tally, a UPS spokesman said the company believed its total compensation package, including health insurance, pension plan, paid vacations and more, makes it competitive.